tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post5269666116838729008..comments2023-09-12T06:11:09.982-07:00Comments on Mongolian Research Notes: Re-evaluating Chinggis KhaanAmerican Center for Mongolian Studieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08879946027347161306noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post-22116663394532497582009-05-19T02:45:00.000-07:002009-05-19T02:45:00.000-07:00Thanks for your interest in the blog. You are free...Thanks for your interest in the blog. You are free to republish the entry if you wish. Note at the bottom of the blog in the footer that all the content is licensed under a creative commons 3.0 non-commercial-share-alike license. As long as you reference our blog, I am happy to share. Thanks for asking.Brian White, ACMS US Directorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05016084281639282851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post-59736303982201599702009-05-18T05:39:00.000-07:002009-05-18T05:39:00.000-07:00Dear Brian,
I read with much interest your article...Dear Brian,<br />I read with much interest your article about Dr. Rossabi and Chinggis Khan.<br />I'm not an real expert on this subject but 've read a lot of books, older ones and recent ones about Mongols and Chingis Khan and agree with Dr. Rossabi that in literature one can observe the same trend of emphasizing the negatives 20, 30 years ago and emphasizing the positives in most literature, published around his 800' birthday.<br />I would like to publicize your column about this subject on my weblog:<br />http://mongolschinaandthesilkroad.blogspot.com/<br />and kindly ask your permission,<br />Kind regards,<br />HansHans v Rnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post-38336923167508760302009-04-23T22:03:00.000-07:002009-04-23T22:03:00.000-07:00For what it is worth, Wikipedia has a page about t...For what it is worth, Wikipedia has a page about the Mongolian tugrik. <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_t%C3%B6gr%C3%B6g" REL="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_t%C3%B6gr%C3%B6g</A>. The Dave's quiz night that evening was definitely wrong. Hope you didn't lose because of it!Brian White, ACMS US Directorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05016084281639282851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post-59405240815785969322009-04-23T21:58:00.000-07:002009-04-23T21:58:00.000-07:00Very interesting, thanks for clearing that up Bria...Very interesting, thanks for clearing that up Brian!<br /><br />Also, whoever said it was Zanabazar at Dave's quiz night that one time was very much wrong.Christianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02496574132223564263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post-86893214417243053172009-04-23T21:52:00.000-07:002009-04-23T21:52:00.000-07:00Sukhbaatar is portrayed on denominations 100 tugri...Sukhbaatar is portrayed on denominations 100 tugriks or less. He looks more lama like than general like in contemporary notes, though.Brian White, ACMS US Directorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05016084281639282851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-947416764841561265.post-25650246678040397972009-04-23T21:11:00.000-07:002009-04-23T21:11:00.000-07:00Dr. Rossabi's talk sounds fascinating, and I'm gla...Dr. Rossabi's talk sounds fascinating, and I'm glad to hear that he addressed all sides of the issue openly.<br /><br />However, I have a somewhat nit-picky detail question. I was under the impression that Zanabazar is the individual portrayed on tugrug notes of 100-and-smaller denominations. Is that someone else?Christianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02496574132223564263noreply@blogger.com